{"id":10820,"date":"2024-02-19T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-02-19T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/cyber-om-cyber-mani-cyber-padme-cyber-hum-where-cyber-buddhists-look-for-an-exit-from-samsara\/"},"modified":"2024-02-19T18:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-02-19T16:00:00","slug":"cyber-om-cyber-mani-cyber-padme-cyber-hum-where-cyber-buddhists-look-for-an-exit-from-samsara","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/cyber-om-cyber-mani-cyber-padme-cyber-hum-where-cyber-buddhists-look-for-an-exit-from-samsara\/","title":{"rendered":"Cyber om, cyber mani, cyber padme, cyber hum: where cyber-Buddhists look for an exit from samsara"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Can you build a monastery in Minecraft and retreat into it with a VR headset? Who lives in neural networks: wrathful entities or the Buddha? And when, at long last, will the quantum Maitreya appear? Pondering these questions, ForkLog sought answers from Mikhail Matrekhin \u2014 a researcher of Eastern spiritual practices and author of the Telegram channel \u00ab<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/hetoimasia\"><strong>\u0423 \u041f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0422\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0430<\/strong><\/a><strong>\u00bb.<\/strong><\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh7-eu.googleusercontent.com\/lmd_ip33z8afFF4kDD8VPu6eyzVRRf9_MKk4rj5Y1RF98V1DGUj0ilnLbUKMfNA3NYu5B0fj_MNKW1s57fAHxsMdNVuLq16Uue-ToJqYZo0qo7Py7t30QVZXbyundRjqRdLi3dZaEShG_K10hb90pJ4\" alt=\"Cyber om, cyber mani, cyber padme, cyber hum: where cyber-Buddhists look for an exit from samsara\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Priyesh Trivedi, \u201cBowser\u201d. Data: <a href=\"https:\/\/themethod.art\/collections\/priyesh-trivedi\/products\/wrathful-entities-2-bowser-by-priyesh-t\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Method Art Space<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: We all know cyberpunk, dabble in the cybereconomy of cyberspace and spent more than a few hours fighting the Cyberdemon in Doom. But what is \u201ccyber-Buddhism\u201d? Is there a single definition, or is it just another word with a flashy prefix?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail:<\/strong> Slap \u201ccyber\u201d on anything and it looks modish. But even plain \u201cBuddhism\u201d is an umbrella term for numerous religions, philosophies and psychopractices. \u201cCyber-Buddhism\u201d is another umbrella under which Buddhist concepts intersect with contemporary science, futurist worldviews and the aesthetics of cyberpunk \u2014 itself indebted in part to Eastern philosophies.<\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t forget the steady rise in popularity of psychotechniques borrowed from Buddhism and Hinduism. Inevitably, people try to graft them onto a modern Western life: say, slotting meditation into employees\u2019 schedules so they feel better and become more efficient on the building sites of capitalism. The religious aspect is tossed overboard. (Though I\u2019m sure that if belief in Buddhist deities boosted productivity, that would be kept too.) In a corporate setting, cyber-Buddhism can mean any hollowed-out Eastern practices repurposed for efficiency.<\/p>\n<p>Many researchers in neuroscience move the same way, finding efficacy in Buddhist techniques. Why are they called Buddhist at all? The Buddha didn\u2019t patent them two and a half millennia ago, but the first systematic forms \u2014 vipassana, shamatha, and the like \u2014 come via his teaching. They let you focus on your own experience and extract something from it. And to everyone\u2019s surprise, neuroscientists found they do work in some way. Now they have champions among atheists and even nihilists like <a href=\"https:\/\/ru.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%80,_%D0%A2%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%81\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Thomas Metzinger<\/a>, who has meditated for 30 years and argues in his works (popularised as the books \u201cBeing No One\u201d and \u201cThe Ego Tunnel\u201d) that the self does not exist. That too is cyber-Buddhism.<\/p>\n<p>There is also plenty of pure cultural pulp. The Matrix, <a href=\"https:\/\/annihilator.katab.asia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Grant Morrison<\/a>\u2019s comics \u2014 proto-cyber-Buddhism that inspires people to erect their \u201coriginal\u201d ideas atop pop-cultural foundations. As art projects, fine. The Matrix is an endless source. I\u2019m not sure what exactly inspired the Wachowski sisters, then still brothers. Some say French philosophers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: In the first film Neo apparently <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.quora.com\/What-relationship-if-any-exists-between-The-Matrix-and-Jean-Baudrillards-Simulacra-and-Simulation\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\"><strong>reads<\/strong><\/a><strong> Jean Baudrillard\u2019s Simulacra and Simulation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail:<\/strong> Exactly. But illusionist theories of reality surely played a part too. The idea, presented simply \u2014 a virtual world built for people grown as batteries \u2014 hits an unprepared mind hard. It becomes part of the cultural narrative and spawns new phenomena. People start asking what underpins The Matrix\u2019s universe. Conspiracy theories sprout that the film is true, and those who have gobbled some substance experience a \u201crevelation\u201d: \u201cOh gods, we\u2019re in the Matrix!\u201d From there they inevitably stumble onto digests of Buddhist ideas and start pushing their own cosmology online.<\/p>\n<p>All this blends into a chorus labelled \u201ccyber-Buddhism\u201d. In Russia there\u2019s even a cyber-Buddhist band, t_error404. They were clearly smitten and swerved from cybergoth to cyber-Buddhism.<\/p>\n<p><iframe style=\"border: 0; width: 100%; height: 120px;\" src=\"https:\/\/bandcamp.com\/EmbeddedPlayer\/album=690451890\/size=large\/bgcol=ffffff\/linkcol=0687f5\/tracklist=false\/artwork=small\/transparent=true\/\" seamless><a href=\"https:\/\/terror404.bandcamp.com\/album\/buddha-20\">Buddha 2.0 by t_error 404<\/a><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Under this umbrella sprouting from an umbrella, is there anything shared with \u201canalog\u201d Buddhism? Crudely: does cyber-Buddhism have cyber-relics?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>Best not to talk cyber-relics \u2014 I personally frown on mummy-veneration. But yes, of course. In the East they like things to look good. All the jokes about drivers who turn their dashboards into iconostases are child\u2019s play compared to Nepali or Indian long-haul trucks. They are temples on wheels. Naturally, when you have diodes and screens, you can rig&#8230; Haha, it\u2019s dark here. Enjoy. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Good luck. See you next time.<\/p>\n<p><em>(The Matrix seems to have glitched; we had to load a fresh copy of our interviewee.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>Where were we?<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: On Nepali truck-temples.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail:<\/strong> In Asia, science and technology help build spectacle in the religious, so to speak, sphere. You\u2019ve probably seen the Japanese <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/fKhgSCc6OAE?feature=shared\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">robots<\/a> that deliver sermons. At bottom, these are conventional ritual practices, no different in essence from a Tibetan prayer wheel: you spin the handle, it turns \u2014 and it counts as you reciting the mantra.<\/p>\n<p>Hence a logical conclusion: if you can \u201crecite\u201d a mantra by merely spinning a wheel, why not set an animated gif as your avatar? Or hang a ticker screen in the temple. But these are aesthetic, external matters. Cyber-Buddhism begins when the religious field is permeated by things tied directly to scientific advance and digitisation.<\/p>\n<p>Put simply, a computer-drawn <a href=\"https:\/\/ru.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8C)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">thangka<\/a> or, say, the well-known <a href=\"https:\/\/wp.nyu.edu\/kennethwang\/2021\/12\/07\/weekly-assignment-5-tv-buddha-by-nam-june-paik\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">installation<\/a> of a Buddha watching TV is just art. Debates about AI and Buddhist ethics are squarely on topic.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Someone from a Christian culture might say neural nets are full of demons. Can a Buddhist retort, \u201cNo, the Buddha is in there\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>What is a neural net in itself? An add-on to creative capacity. But first, recall this.<\/p>\n<p>In Buddhism humans live in the middle realm, above which sit two tiers: the asuras and the devas, in constant opposition. Think a heavenly USA and a heavenly USSR. Asuras are aggrieved titans brimming with ressentiment, envious of the devas and forever at war. Devas are gods who can create worlds at will, or anything else grand. They spend most of their time generating content that pleases them \u2014 and relishing it.<\/p>\n<p>There are classes of devas who create virtual realities, and higher classes who luxuriate in others\u2019 virtual realities. Among them lurks the chief tempter, a Buddhist version of Satan: Mara, a deva who tirelessly promotes multiverses. A celestial Zuckerberg who dislikes users unplugging from his marvellous metaverse. Mara is not \u201cevil\u201d, doom and death, but mindless lingering in illusion.<\/p>\n<p>When you generate with a neural net, you probe something fundamentally average. The US military once tried to build the perfect cockpit. They measured a hundred parameters across thousands of pilots and designed to the mean. It turned out no one could sit comfortably in the averaged cockpit. The average human doesn\u2019t exist; everyone differs. A neural net is the ideal average creature, built from statistics and lacking even minimal agency.<\/p>\n<p>Gazing at an archetype built from the averaged version of you is mesmerising. From a Buddhist view, when you gain access to an endlessly productive tool that can conjure anything from anything, you become a deva, a celestial trust-fund kid. But here\u2019s the rub. You can freeze, entranced for aeons, playing \u2014 and miss the crucial moment you might have spent on awakening. Afterwards it may be too late.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh7-eu.googleusercontent.com\/NrUSY6RAUp7p7WsiMNeAiOnKOX2N-buXx_fetEVakCo4xlLxR991D9QaAvaYgy5lDh2bCvK2uN5Q0ZMEGTZjlL3_Ld3u2lXc3cI_3wgLj6p4FdufBGynVD45V0bthwal_WAGOOUvRkfG-VfaizzeKPg\" alt=\"Cyber om, cyber mani, cyber padme, cyber hum: where cyber-Buddhists look for an exit from samsara\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Image generated by DALL\u00b7E 3. Data: ForkLog.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: If you stare long enough at images generated to our averaged notions of beauty, you may find them, well, cringe \u2014 ugly enough to flee from.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>That is a deeply Buddhist thought \u2014 precisely where <span data-descr=\"In Buddhism \u2014 the readiness to relinquish attachments and desires as sources of suffering\" class=\"old_tooltip\">renunciation<\/span> begins. You see the shabbiness even of the conventionally prized. Midjourney gives you \u201cbeauty\u201d, yet it feels predictable, stock. You start to suspect the rest may be just as stock, cookie-cutter. And you begin to ponder serious existential questions. In Buddhism, that\u2019s a valuable moment.<\/p>\n<p>Neural nets show us our own minds in the mirror. We fail to grasp that it\u2019s our reflection and imagine a new entity on the screen. In content produced by a net trained on our data, we see more than is there. That\u2019s scary, because illusion-making via such a product of the human mind is highly efficient. It\u2019s easy to imagine entire worlds built for individuals, in which they are kept like in prison cells.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: If we assume we live in a photostock, can we upgrade our plan? At least switch to premium.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>From the Buddhist point of view (or rather, Buddhisms), one should strive from \u201creality-as-constructed\u201d to the <em>immediate<\/em> real. But we can\u2019t look at it directly because we\u2019re inside a spacesuit of perception. We constantly construct a reality overlaid upon the real; those with a more efficient model are closer to how the <em>immediate, unconditioned<\/em> real is.<\/p>\n<p>Some think immediate perception is attainable; others think it\u2019s impossible. We\u2019re condemned to dwell in our own perceptual suits, never certain another person sees the same reality. Hence fundamental questions about <a href=\"https:\/\/ru.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">qualia<\/a>, which may differ yet go unnoticed.<\/p>\n<p>The neural net is a handy metaphor to teach big philosophical questions; through it you can explain general ideas on your fingers. But it\u2019s unlikely to yield clear <span data-descr=\"In religious philosophy \u2014 pertaining to personal salvation\" class=\"old_tooltip\">soteriological<\/span> conclusions. You can extract a very non-universal moral: \u201cDitch neural nets, do everything by hand; it\u2019ll be more real.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: But how can anything be more or less real in an originally illusory world?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>Illusory doesn\u2019t mean \u201cdoesn\u2019t exist at all\u201d. Everything exists \u2014 conventionally. And (at least intuitively) there is a hierarchy of \u201crealness\u201d. For a person, what they make with their own hands carries higher status. Neural nets churn out content that feels less \u201creal\u201d. The ontological status of the end-product may be close, but ask a net to write poetry and you\u2019ll immediately spot where it\u2019s AI and where it\u2019s a living human. Have you tried making poems with a net?<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Of course. Asked for verse, ChatGPT produces something that is the opposite of what people expect from poetry \u2014 a surprising angle on the world.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>So it is with many things \u2014 a jamming into the Procrustean bed of the average. Yet it\u2019s possible to use today\u2019s net-tech to create something maximally original \u2014 which will also look wild. But if we return to this from a Buddhist angle, the whole kaleidoscope of meanings, ideas and images turns out superfluous. For a Buddhist it is pointless. The point lies in what is usually deemed pointless: simply sitting, doing nothing, observing the processes of the mind. Then you realise your brain, your mind, is also a neural net constantly generating in predictable patterns. When it stops generating content, that\u2019s the ideal state.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Can one build a Buddhist monastery in, say, Minecraft \u2014 and withdraw into it?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>What matters is the end effect. We already live in virtual reality, all the time \u2014 at its base layers. If you add another layer, it won\u2019t change how you feel at the layer that is basic for you. In principle, you can retreat into Zuckerberg\u2019s monastery. You\u2019ll still have to maintain physiological functions.<\/p>\n<p>VR headsets are more a decent tool for deprivation \u2014 central to monastic practice. For instance, limiting communication, which leads to imaginary friends appearing out of nowhere. Put someone in a cave for 40 days and they\u2019ll start talking to objects; images will appear with a reality that grows the longer the isolation. Vajrayana and Tibetan Buddhism use this: three-year cave retreats with no contact. If you\u2019re in a virtual monastery in Minecraft and cannot talk to other players, that will have a psychoactive effect. Your marbles will, naturally, begin to roll, but ideally it accelerates transformational processes \u2014 if done by the book (don\u2019t try this at home without an instructor). So a virtual monastery is possible, but in some cases it\u2019s tantamount to a virtual asylum.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh7-eu.googleusercontent.com\/tLsyjlkWx1TQs_6qBjUmWF0a6l_E_kDI7JL9fezrQPuc7r4Fb1KLgjFl3ylZETVQQMX-ZovAPZtxyCMxXXNdFFsPVLZXN2UQCvaM2BIFWoRr6BmjP3qjT0e-iozLN-_AlkZMYqvp-7MD5yatUYrJdlk\" alt=\"Cyber om, cyber mani, cyber padme, cyber hum: where cyber-Buddhists look for an exit from samsara\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Wat Ratchanatdaram temple in Minecraft. Data: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.planetminecraft.com\/project\/wat-ratchanatdaram-worawihan-bangkok-thailand-on-1-1-scale-bte\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Planet Minecraft<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Does cyber-Buddhism condemn killing a llama in Minecraft?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>On Buddhist forums, such questions crop up. In principle, program code is not a \u201csentient being\u201d. Is telling a story about someone\u2019s death a killing? So I\u2019d say killing a llama in virtual space is not objectionable for some Buddhisms, though it will likely alarm others.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: There is a pop meme: \u201cIf you meet the Buddha, kill the Buddha.\u201d In cyber-Buddhist terms, is it fair to restyle it as \u201cIf you meet a llama in Minecraft, kill the llama in Minecraft\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>It\u2019s a call to reject authorities and to test everything in personal experience. If you personally see killing a llama in Minecraft as a manifestation of that refusal, it may be useful. If you consider it a dubious gesture, it probably won\u2019t be.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: The current Dalai Lama actively promotes bringing Buddhism and science together: Buddhism with neuroscience, cognitive science, quantum physics. For Christian theology, that\u2019s largely an old stage; mainstream theologians no longer insist the Earth was made in six days seven thousand years ago. They grapple with speculative metaphysics. Can Buddhism be reconciled with science \u2014 and is it justified or useful?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>To start, Ngawang Lobsang Tenzin Gyatso represents one strand of Buddhism: the northern. He is first and foremost a Tibetan politician. Treating him like a pope is odd: he speaks for a very small stratum of Buddhists that got a voice because most \u00e9migr\u00e9 lamas went to the US. Hence attention to the occupation of Tibet \u2014 or rather, the complex and ambiguous politics around Tibet \u2014 led to the Dalai Lama being perceived as speaking for all Buddhists.<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, he courts the Western progressive milieu and promotes \u201cBuddhism with a human face\u201d through engagement with science. Science is good, rational; science \u201cproves\u201d Buddhist practices work. It works well in the short term. There\u2019s the monk Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche, on whom lab tests confirmed the efficacy of Buddhist meditations. Reports of those experiments reached Thomas Metzinger, who, duly impressed, wrote The Ego Tunnel. Peter Watts read it and wrote the novel Blindsight. Four handshakes later, a heap of people are curious about Buddhism. Science works!<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Let\u2019s peer ahead. Debates around <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/news\/quantum-computers-who-will-bask-in-the-glow-of-the-analogue-digital-chandelier\"><strong>quantum computers<\/strong><\/a><strong> have rekindled. What would \u201cquantum cyber-Buddhism\u201d look like?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail:<\/strong> There\u2019s a Buddhist prophecy that, in the future, the Buddha Maitreya will come when humanity reaches maximal lifespan and becomes so technically perfected that it is looped on itself. People will no longer be able to step beyond sensuous existence. They will need a reminder of Buddhist ethics, psychopractice and philosophy so that these transhuman beings can be liberated.<\/p>\n<p>Each time we imagine fantastical scenarios, we forget that the slightest tweak to daily life shifts the whole picture. Suppose people live longer. That alone brings societal and technical upheavals. Imagine an unreplaceable elite of long-livers. Or, if people get productive and computational capacities beyond our ken? We can\u2019t predict what will be. A quantum computer could crack anything anytime, hijack any access codes \u2014 turning our world into Russian roulette, as anyone might be first to seize the secrets of strategic value. So with a hypothetical \u201cquantum cyber-Buddhism\u201d: future tech will surely be usable in psychopractice. It may prompt radical transformations \u2014 not necessarily positive.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: We\u2019ve discussed attempts at a secular Buddhism stripped of religion. Are there counter-movements within cyber-Buddhism towards the mystical?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail:<\/strong> Mostly it looks marginal, but of course such trends exist. In the West there are many \u201cchemical Buddhists\u201d: people who had a strong psychoactive experience with states typical of Dharmic religions, then took up Buddhism and tried to reconcile it with modernity \u2014 combining Eastern techniques with psychoactives.<\/p>\n<p>Why not? Vajrayana did use psychoactive substances; what prevents using modern pharmacology and VR for the same ends? Usually it yields the most miserable results, but it happens. After all, if your choice is between corporate meditation to boost productivity or \u201cget wrecked and contemplate ultimate reality in the company of wrathful deities\u2019 avatars\u201d, the latter sounds more exciting.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh7-eu.googleusercontent.com\/Pk0soGwxdWkI5I6Z9YMiar3jmi8QdFMim1mxDuGmC_sSOuYSX91AGMf1Kn6Ci6OjO8a_YtfzB1Dzrzt_qwff_7uC8KqJhhj357_6XET0M1T892_-yAEu2G9lkTjBx-PkRZBfyhCrva0C3ooEvVywwBQ\" alt=\"Cyber om, cyber mani, cyber padme, cyber hum: where cyber-Buddhists look for an exit from samsara\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Priyesh Trivedi, \u201cWrathful Entities\u201d. Data: Method Art Space.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: Historically Buddhism has made a point of enlightening people, so perhaps there\u2019s no contradiction in these explorations.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail:<\/strong> Yes. Tibet won Mongol patronage thanks to the monks\u2019 intellectual and cultural achievements that genuinely impressed the khans. The monks, in turn, were aghast at the practice of slaughtering elders and prisoners and asked them to stop; the Mongols, in principle, agreed. It led to a measure of humanisation inside medieval Asian states. The patron shapes the ward \u2014 and the ward shapes the patron. So today: exiled Tibetan lamas seek refuge from Chinese repression in the West, then it all cycles back in the form of imagery and research via the First World\u2019s cultural hegemony.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ForkLog: So Buddhism undergoes a sort of \u201c<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ru.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%AD%D1%84%D1%84%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%86%D1%8B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\"><strong>pizza effect<\/strong><\/a><strong>\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mikhail: <\/strong>It\u2019s not new \u2014 Buddhism has seen this many times. Think of Chinese pilgrimages to India that yielded Journey to the West, one of China\u2019s great novels. Medieval \u201ctravel bloggers\u201d suspected they\u2019d been sold a distorted Buddhism, so they went to the source to take a backup, return home and update (or rather, roll back) to something closer to the original. This happens constantly, and newer versions often end up closer to the source. But that\u2019s now a doctrinal question.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, stereotyped perceptions of Buddhism get in the way \u2014 born of many causes. When the British colonised India, we got one stereotype. Mid-20th-century stereotypes followed \u2014 hippies, the popularisation of The Tibetan Book of the Dead, and so on. No less stereotypical is seeing Buddhism through <span data-descr=\"\u201cFree Tibet\u201d \u2014 a catch-all label for movements and organisations that advocate for Tibetans\u2019 rights\" class=\"old_tooltip\">Free Tibet<\/span>. The notion that the Buddha is a plump golden Asian god persists, though that figure is the bodhisattva <a href=\"https:\/\/ru.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%8D%D0%B9\">Hotei<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>All this shapes Westerners who sometimes feel deflated when they reach the sources and find the same things as in their own culture: similar ethics, similar clericalism, ritualism. The average Buddhist is not far from an Orthodox granny \u2014 perhaps a tad more upbeat and humane. It\u2019s easy to disappoint the Western public (both secularists and esotericists) with the various Buddhisms.<\/p>\n<p>The scholar of religion Yevgeny Torchinov described how hip, Beat-inspired Americans went to Zen monasteries in Japan. With iconoclast clich\u00e9s in mind, they saw statues of the Buddha everywhere and asked: \u201cHow so? \u2018If you meet the Buddha, kill the Buddha.\u2019 Let\u2019s destroy the statue.\u201d Locals were, naturally, flabbergasted.<\/p>\n<p><em>(Mikhail likely refers to an episode from Yevgeny Torchinov\u2019s Introduction to Buddhology: <\/em><em>\u201cIt is worth recalling a curious incident involving the contemporary American populariser of Japanese Zen, P. Kapleau. When he first arrived in Japan and entered a Zen monastery, the first thing he saw was a monk lighting a candle before a portrait of the monastery\u2019s founder. Kapleau said to him, \u2018Why are you lighting the candle? Wouldn\u2019t it be better to smash this image?\u2019 The monk replied, \u2018If you want to do that, smash it. And I would rather place a candle in front of it.\u2019\u201d)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>To avoid stereotypes and bias, acquaint yourself with everything \u2014 and keep in mind that every mode of perception has a corresponding philosophy. That applies not only to Buddhism but to anything else we may dislike. It\u2019s worth accepting this to deal more effectively with people around us \u2014 whose viewpoints can at least be modelled and roughly anticipated. Then you can find consensus. Such is the way of things.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Can you build a monastery in Minecraft and retreat into it with a VR headset? Who lives in neural networks: wrathful entities or the Buddha? And when, at long last, will the quantum Maitreya appear? Pondering these questions, ForkLog sought answers from Mikhail Matrekhin \u2014 a researcher of Eastern spiritual practices and author of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10819,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"select":"","news_style_id":"","cryptorium_level":"","_short_excerpt_text":"","creation_source":"","_metatest_mainpost_news_update":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1144],"tags":[438,1361,1366],"class_list":["post-10820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-longreads","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-virtual-world-innovations","tag-vr-ar"],"aioseo_notices":[],"amp_enabled":true,"views":"24","promo_type":"","layout_type":"","short_excerpt":"","is_update":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10820\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10819"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}