{"id":89794,"date":"2025-10-10T14:39:26","date_gmt":"2025-10-10T11:39:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/?p=89794"},"modified":"2025-10-10T14:42:24","modified_gmt":"2025-10-10T11:42:24","slug":"the-many-faces-of-satoshis-coinjoin-payjoin-silent-payments-or-mixers-what-to-choose-in-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/the-many-faces-of-satoshis-coinjoin-payjoin-silent-payments-or-mixers-what-to-choose-in-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"The many faces of satoshis: CoinJoin, PayJoin, Silent Payments or mixers\u2014what to choose in 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bitcoin was conceived as a pseudonymous system\u2014all transactions are public, but participants\u2019 identities are hidden behind addresses. Modern analytics, however, can readily link them to real people.<\/p>\n<p>The team behind the Bitcoin mixer <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/mixer.money\/ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mixer.Money<\/a> analysed the up-to-date methods for anonymising transactions in 2025. We examine which technologies protect user privacy and how effective they are.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CoinJoin and PayJoin<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/news\/what-is-coinjoin-what-is-zerolink-what-is-stonewall\">CoinJoin<\/a> is a technique to enhance anonymity by combining transactions from several users. Participants send bitcoins into a common pool and receive equal amounts back to new addresses.<\/p>\n<p>The concept was proposed in 2013 by Bitcoin developer Gregory Maxwell. In subsequent years, multiple implementations emerged, such as WabiSabi by Wasabi Wallet and Whirlpool by Samourai Wallet.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Example:<\/strong> Alice and four others want more confidentiality. They gather their <a href=\"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/news\/utxo-management-how-to-prepare-your-bitcoin-wallet-for-a-bull-market\">UTXO<\/a> of 0.1 BTC each. A joint transaction sends the funds and returns 0.099 BTC to new addresses (after fees). On-chain, there are five inputs and five equal outputs. Tracing which output belongs to Alice is nearly impossible.<\/p>\n<p>PayJoin (or Pay-to-Endpoint, P2EP) is a variant of CoinJoin in which the sender and recipient jointly construct a transaction: the latter adds their own input to break the heuristic that \u201call inputs in a transaction belong to one user\u201d (<a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/river.com\/learn\/terms\/c\/common-input-ownership-heuristic\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">common input ownership heuristic<\/a>)\u2014a mainstay of on-chain analytics.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cPayJoin is a protocol for cooperative transaction construction. The parties exchange information about UTXO over a P2P channel (for example, an onion service) and jointly create and sign the transaction using <span data-descr=\"partially signed Bitcoin transaction (BIP-174)\" class=\"old_tooltip\">PSBT<\/span>,\u201d explain representatives of <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/mixer.money\/ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mixer.Money<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The resulting transaction looks ordinary: multiple inputs, multiple outputs, with nothing outwardly marking it as the product of mixing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Example:<\/strong> Alice wants to send Bob 0.05 BTC. Instead of a direct transfer, they use PayJoin.<\/p>\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Alice notifies Bob which UTXO she is willing to use and drafts a transaction.<\/li>\n<li>Bob adds his own input (say, 0.02 BTC) and a change address.<\/li>\n<li>The parties exchange signatures within a PSBT and sign the joint transaction.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Bob then receives 0.05 BTC, and his change goes to a new address. From the outside it looks like a regular transaction; analysts cannot determine which input belonged to Alice and which to Bob.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cCoinJoin provides anonymity, but its patterns are visible on-chain. Analytics firms tag such UTXO as having passed through a mixer. Some exchanges refuse to accept coins after CoinJoin without additional checks,\u201d comment Mixer.Money.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Only a handful of wallets have <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/en.bitcoin.it\/wiki\/PayJoin_adoption\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">implemented<\/a> PayJoin so far, and both sides need to support the protocol to use it. The technology has yet to gain mass adoption.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Lightning Network<\/h2>\n<p>The Lightning Network (LN) is often viewed as a privacy enhancement for Bitcoin because transactions occur off-chain and onion routing prevents intermediate nodes from seeing the full payment path.<\/p>\n<p>However, opening a Lightning channel requires an on-chain funding transaction. Most public channels are announced via the <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/ru.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gossip_(%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">gossip<\/a> protocol, including the hash of that transaction and the specific output UTXO used for funding. Observers can therefore link on-chain Bitcoin addresses to particular Lightning nodes, which partly erodes privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Intermediate nodes see the IP addresses of their neighbours and the amount relayed, but not the entire route. If an adversary controls several nodes along the path, they may correlate timing and amounts to infer sender or recipient.<\/p>\n<p>The main weakness is that by 2025 most users favour mobile LN wallets with relays (Lightning Service Providers, LSPs) or custodial options such as Wallet of Satoshi. In such cases the provider sees most or even all payments, materially reducing privacy.<\/p>\n<p>In December 2021, Chainalysis <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chainalysis.com\/blog\/lightning-network-support\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">announced<\/a> support for the Lightning Network and added LN-transaction analysis to its stack.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Silent Payments<\/h2>\n<p>Silent Payments (BIP-352) are one of Bitcoin\u2019s latest developments. The concept was put forward by developer Ruben Somsen in 2022 and was formalised as a BIP in March 2023.<\/p>\n<p>The mechanism solves address reuse: to preserve privacy, a new address is typically needed each time, which is inconvenient. Silent Payments let users employ a single static address (starting with sp1) without sacrificing anonymity.<\/p>\n<p>The recipient creates an sp1 address with two key sets\u2014a scanning key and a spending key. Using that address and their own private key, the sender applies ECDH (Elliptic Curve Diffie\u2013Hellman) to derive a unique hidden output.<\/p>\n<p>On-chain it looks like a regular Taproot address; it is impossible to tell a silent payment took place. The recipient scans blocks with the scanning key to find outputs intended for them.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cBIP-352 significantly improves the user experience, but its future depends on support from app developers and major crypto exchanges. Without integration with popular services, mass adoption will not happen: Bitcoin mixers will remain the more universal and more comprehensible solution for anonymising transactions,\u201d notes the Mixer.Money team.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Bitcoin mixers<\/h2>\n<p>A Bitcoin mixer is the earliest method of anonymising transactions. Services such as Bitcoin Fog <a href=\"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/news\/bitcoin-fog-operator-sentenced-to-12-5-years-for-money-laundering\">emerged<\/a> back in 2011 and worked by mixing users\u2019 coins via a centralised pool.<\/p>\n<p>Over time, the effectiveness of that approach declined. Modern blockchain-analytics methods <a href=\"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/news\/how-bitcoin-transactions-are-tracked\">allow<\/a> links between inputs and outputs to be reconstructed, especially in mixers with repetitive transaction patterns.<\/p>\n<p>In response, developers are seeking new ways to break on-chain ties. For example, Mixer.Money has <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/mixer.money\/ru\/how-it-works\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">implemented<\/a> the bitcoin.mixer 2.0 algorithm: coins enter a premixer, are anonymised, split into random parts and sent by the platform to exchange wallets of investors. The user then receives coins from other exchanges and other investors to two previously specified addresses.<\/p>\n<p>This approach avoids mixing funds. The client receives an equivalent amount (minus the fee) with a completely different history\u2014effectively coins recently withdrawn from trading platforms.<\/p>\n<p>The service offers three mixing modes:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cMixer\u201d<\/strong> \u2014 basic privacy for a 1% fee and a two-hour wait. Coins are mixed with those of other clients. The use of a mixer may be noticeable under deep analysis;<\/li>\n<li><strong>\u201cFull anonymity\u201d<\/strong> \u2014 the highest (offered by the service) level of protection for a 4\u20135% fee and up to a ten-hour wait. Exchange reserves are used, so the fact of using a mixer is completely hidden;<\/li>\n<li><strong>\u201cExact payment\u201d<\/strong> \u2014 sending funds directly to a third party via the mixer. Combines anonymisation with settlement. The seller receives payment within six hours \u201cfrom an exchange\u201d and cannot trace the origin of the money.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>To anonymise coins via Mixer.Money, it suffices to:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>visit the <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/mixer.money\/ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">website<\/a>; <\/li>\n<li>choose a mode; specify return addresses; <\/li>\n<li>send bitcoins to the provided address.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The service requires no registration and issues a guarantee letter with a PGP signature for support enquiries. A <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.mixer.money\/ru\/bitkoin-mikser-poshagovaya-instrukciya\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">free test<\/a> is available: send 0.001 BTC and you receive it back without a fee.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusions<\/h2>\n<p>In 2025, Bitcoin users have several tools to protect privacy. Each solves a different problem.<\/p>\n<p>CoinJoin is suitable for breaking UTXO history but leaves traces on-chain. PayJoin camouflages payments but requires both sides to support it. The Lightning Network protects against broad surveillance but does not ensure full anonymity.<\/p>\n<p>Silent Payments are a promising technology for static addresses, but they have yet to gain mass adoption. Mixers such as <a class=\"tracking_link\" href=\"https:\/\/mixer.money\/ru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mixer.Money<\/a> remain the most universal tool for full anonymisation.<\/p>\n<p>For best results, combine methods according to your goal and avoid co-mingling anonymised coins with those withdrawn from exchanges and swap services after <span data-descr=\"know your customer\" class=\"old_tooltip\">KYC<\/span>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bitcoin was built as a pseudonymous system, yet modern analytics can link addresses to real people. The Mixer.Money team reviews 2025 privacy methods\u2014CoinJoin, PayJoin, Lightning, Silent Payments and mixers\u2014and how effective they are.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":89795,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"select":"1","news_style_id":"5","cryptorium_level":"","_short_excerpt_text":"A 2025 guide to Bitcoin privacy: CoinJoin, PayJoin, Lightning, Silent Payments and mixers.","creation_source":"","_metatest_mainpost_news_update":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[18,1544,1256],"class_list":["post-89794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-and-analysis","tag-bitcoin","tag-coinjoin","tag-privacy-and-personal-data"],"aioseo_notices":[],"amp_enabled":true,"views":"361","promo_type":"1","layout_type":"5","short_excerpt":"A 2025 guide to Bitcoin privacy: CoinJoin, PayJoin, Lightning, Silent Payments and mixers.","is_update":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89794"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89794\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":89796,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89794\/revisions\/89796"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/89795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forklog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}